W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: genid:

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:01:10 -0400
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1303311670.2751.67.camel@waldron>
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:50 +0200, Ivan Herman wrote:
> 
> > 2/ Why not a URN NID? <urn:bnode:...>    Is registration easier?
> > 
> 
> I do not know   :-(

Yes, I think it's easier, but it seems vaguely useless/silly to have the
"urn" in there as well.   It probably makes sense to try for bnode:
first and see what kind of pushback we get, if we're going this route.

(and tag: didn't take "10 years", but ... it did take a lot longer than
I would have expected.)

      -- Sandro
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 15:01:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT