W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Additional terminology

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:58:57 +0100
Message-ID: <4DB74021.9050201@webr3.org>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 21 Apr 2011, at 10:21, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>> plain literals without language tag
>> The need to describe this thing was so common in SPARQL 1.0 that Eric proposed "simple literal" for this.
> Perhaps this particular class of literals is particularly prominent in SPARQL, but from my reading of the RDF Recommendation Set it doesn't actually occur all that often.
> “Simple literal” vs “plain literal” isn't very clear naming.

string vs text?
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 22:00:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:58 UTC