- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:58:57 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 21 Apr 2011, at 10:21, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> plain literals without language tag >> The need to describe this thing was so common in SPARQL 1.0 that Eric proposed "simple literal" for this. > > Perhaps this particular class of literals is particularly prominent in SPARQL, but from my reading of the RDF Recommendation Set it doesn't actually occur all that often. > > “Simple literal” vs “plain literal” isn't very clear naming. string vs text?
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 22:00:33 UTC