- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:22:26 +0100
- To: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 20 Apr 2011, at 18:15, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote: > It turns out that the RDF Semantics document already contains wording in > Section 5.1 about the equivalence of plain literals and xsd:string > literals. Any change to the document to indicate that xsd:string > literals are considered to be archaic and that plain literals should be > used instead would look similar to the wording for anything else the WG > considers to be archaic. Related here is Section 6.5.1 of RDF Concepts & Abstract Syntax, which states that two literals are equal if and only if they are equal in lexical form, datatype URI, and language tag [1]. Not suggesting any particular course of action, just pointing out related text. Best, Richard [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Literal-Equality > > I claim, therefore, that ACTION-27 is done, and have marked it as > pending approval. > > peter > > PS: I think that ISSUE-12 should be marked as closed, but that's not my > call. >
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 21:28:43 UTC