W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs]

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:06:22 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QApHa-0001tA-R3@barney.w3.org>

RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs]

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/38

Raised by: Antoine Zimmermann
On product: RDF Graphs

If it is possible to assert statements about g-*, then we may need some additional vocabulary such as a class rdf:Graph and possibly relations between them such as graph imports, subgraph, equivalent graph, etc. and maybe a property that relates an instance of rdf:Graph to its content.
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 20:06:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT