W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: genid:

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:16:44 +0200
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <0303CBE3-B1BE-4C27-91ED-120222C6C97C@w3.org>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>

On Apr 20, 2011, at 17:01 , Sandro Hawke wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:50 +0200, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> 
>>> 2/ Why not a URN NID? <urn:bnode:...>    Is registration easier?
>>> 
>> 
>> I do not know   :-(
> 
> Yes, I think it's easier, but it seems vaguely useless/silly to have the
> "urn" in there as well.   It probably makes sense to try for bnode:
> first and see what kind of pushback we get, if we're going this route.
> 
> (and tag: didn't take "10 years",

Sorry for stretching the truth a little bit:-)

I.


> but ... it did take a lot longer than
> I would have expected.)
> 
>      -- Sandro
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 09:15:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT