W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:19:14 -0400
Message-ID: <20110405.111914.38971625962566159.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <tomac@google.com>
CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <hannes@muehleisen.org>
From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
Subject: Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:17:49 -0500

> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 17:12, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> I'm looking at the Linked Data API one, and I see foaf_name vs just
>> knows.  Is this a feature or a bug?
> Feature. The Linked Data API JSON is assumed namespace-free, so in
> order to have foaf:name and iCollide:name, one has to come up with new
> tokens to differentiate the two.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tom

Hmm.   How are the new names determined?

peter
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 15:20:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT