W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

RDF-ISSUE-37 (fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:42:23 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QAnyJ-00038Z-7s@lowblow.w3.org>

RDF-ISSUE-37 (fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/37

Raised by: Richard Cyganiak
On product: 

This is a leftover from the previous RDF working group:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-fragids-in-embedded-rdf
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0143.html

Specifications for languages that embed RDF in them should defer to the RDF specs for the interpretation of fragment identifiers defined in embedded RDF.

Consider say, an SVG document, that contains embedded RDF that defines a fragment identifier. The SVG specification should say that the fragment identifier should be treated as an RDF fragment identifier. It has been suggested that this may be a general issue for the TAG about the treatment of fragment identifiers when one language is embedded in another.

This is getting more interesting in light of the existence of RDFa.
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 18:42:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT