W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:43:00 -0500
Message-Id: <C41E2C47-6723-4F58-BD7E-FB4EA5C7A9C8@ihmc.us>
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I note in passing that the Proposed WG Decision dated 14 April has the consequence that the IRi associated with a graph in SPARQL cannot be used inside an RDF triple to reliably refer to the graph. This means in particular that uses such as those contemplated in
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/RDF-Datasets-Proposal, which use the SPARQL name as the object in an 'imports' triple, are ruled out by this decision. 

Pat

On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:29 AM, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> 
> ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/30
> 
> Raised by: 
> On product: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 16:43:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT