W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:23:06 +0100
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4D40F8C8-2BEF-42EE-8BEF-D91E71ED3C11@cyganiak.de>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
On 8 Apr 2011, at 10:05, Steve Harris wrote:
>> rdf:Seq does have some merit, and some serious 'in the wild' usage.
> Agreed. While far from perfect, in some situations it's preferable to RDF Lists.

Can you give examples where rdf:Seq is preferable to rdf:List?

Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 09:23:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:58 UTC