W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:59:25 -0500
Cc: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-rdf-wg@w3.org >> public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AF49031C-6068-4A18-9369-E18A4EE6C36F@ihmc.us>
To: William Waites <ww@styx.org>

On Apr 19, 2011, at 2:52 AM, William Waites wrote:

> * [2011-04-18 12:58:27 -0500] Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> écrit:
> 
> ] However, what if you get a 303 redirect?
> 
> So this one's easy, I think. The original URL identifies the graph or
> g-box, the target of the redirect identifies a g-text of that g-box
> and the deserialised contents of that g-text are a g-snap of that
> g-box.

No no, that won't do. The http-range-14 decision is that a 303 redirect means that the original URI *might* refer to a non-information resource, like a real solid thing in the world. So we can't declare what it might mean in this case, in fact we have to be careful not to do so. 

> I'm not at all convinced that this new nomenclature won't be
> confusing to readers of the spec though but maybe there's nothing to
> be done about that.

I agree we need to come up with better terminology than g-*

Pat


> 
> -w
> -- 
> William Waites                <mailto:ww@styx.org>
> http://river.styx.org/ww/        <sip:ww@styx.org>
> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB  3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 14:00:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT