W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:29:27 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Q9wO7-0008Su-5d@lowblow.w3.org>


ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/30

Raised by: 
On product:

Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 09:29:33 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker: "ISSUE-31: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs?"
Previous message: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker: "ISSUE-29: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?"
Next in thread: Pat Hayes: "Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?"
Reply: Pat Hayes: "Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT