- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:21:36 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 01/04/11 20:06, Nathan wrote: >> Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> Are there examples of real worlds data that uses relative IRIs in >>> N-triples? If not, we could decide that theer is no base processing in >>> RDF-triples, absolute IRIs only. >> >> How can we have @base processing if there are no directives or @base >> definitions? I'd strongly suggest we keep this to *IRI*s only. > > The base is also set by where the file is read from. Indeed, reliably though? for instance taking in to account the file being sent by email, being part of a zip archive, being in the message body of a PUT HTTP request, being in the body of a GET HTTP response with a Content-Location which differs from the effective request URI? Personally, I'd quite like that can of worms left closed for RDF-Triples :) Best, Nathan
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 19:22:51 UTC