W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:21:36 +0100
Message-ID: <4D9625C0.3050908@webr3.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 01/04/11 20:06, Nathan wrote:
>> Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>> Are there examples of real worlds data that uses relative IRIs in
>>> N-triples? If not, we could decide that theer is no base processing in
>>> RDF-triples, absolute IRIs only.
>> How can we have @base processing if there are no directives or @base
>> definitions? I'd strongly suggest we keep this to *IRI*s only.
> The base is also set by where the file is read from.

Indeed, reliably though? for instance taking in to account the file 
being sent by email, being part of a zip archive, being in the message 
body of a PUT HTTP request, being in the body of a GET HTTP response 
with a Content-Location which differs from the effective request URI?

Personally, I'd quite like that can of worms left closed for RDF-Triples :)


Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 19:22:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:58 UTC