Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] from Richard Cyganiak on 2011-04-16 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from April 2011)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:05:16 +0100
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4488AB68-134A-4D52-85B6-72079F69497A@cyganiak.de>

Antoine,

How is this different from ISSUE-35?

Best,
Richard


On 15 Apr 2011, at 21:06, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/38
> 
> Raised by: Antoine Zimmermann
> On product: RDF Graphs
> 
> If it is possible to assert statements about g-*, then we may need some additional vocabulary such as a class rdf:Graph and possibly relations between them such as graph imports, subgraph, equivalent graph, etc. and maybe a property that relates an instance of rdf:Graph to its content.
> 
> 
>

Received on Saturday, 16 April 2011 15:06:03 UTC