W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:04:21 -0400
Message-ID: <20110420.130421.1146826542365312835.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <david.wood@talis.com>
CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
From: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com>
Subject: [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:38:12 -0500

> Hi all,
> Minutes for the FTF1 were not accepted on today's call due to two
> separate email threads that resulted in -1 votes on the mailing list
> after the meeting.  I took an action to add notes into the minutes to
> point to those threads. 
> 1)  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0366.html
> This comment was added to 13 April's minutes:
> [[
> See post-FTF1 email discussion regarding this resolution at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0366.html
> ]]
> 2)  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0310.html
> Nathan commented on a proposal which was not adopted, so I did not
> change the minutes. 
> My understanding is that the minutes now reflect both the meeting and
> the post-meeting comments. 
> Regards,
> Dave

Hmm.  The emails that I was thinking of are
from Antoine Zimmermann, and 
from Lee Feigenbaum
both of which have -1 on 
PROPOSED: Mark xs:string as archaic for use in RDF, recommending use of 
plain literals instead. Recommend that systems silently convert 
xs:string data to plain literals.

In subsequence email, I tried to point out that there is an invalid
assumption in the thread.  Nonetheless, the discussion should probably
be noted in the F2F minutes, which I have done.

Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 17:05:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:58 UTC