W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:06:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4D96224B.3040302@webr3.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Are there examples of real worlds data that uses relative IRIs in 
> N-triples?  If not, we could decide that theer is no base processing in 
> RDF-triples, absolute IRIs only.

How can we have @base processing if there are no directives or @base 
definitions? I'd strongly suggest we keep this to *IRI*s only.

nb: absolute-IRI doesn't allow for a fragment, it's "IRI" that we need.

   IRI           = scheme ":" ihier-part [ "?" iquery ] [ "#" ifragment ]
   absolute-IRI  = scheme ":" ihier-part [ "?" iquery ]

   URI           = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]
   absolute-URI  = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ]

Best,

Nathan
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 19:08:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT