W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

canonical definition of RDF?

From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:22:07 -0400
Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Message-Id: <69EB588D-4E2B-4902-8B44-9AF4DF790ABF@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
All --

Forgive a newb-ish question from a newly nominated member...

I'm struggling with authoritatively answering a conversational 
question -- "What *is* RDF?" -- without falling back to markup
and serialization.

I can't find a canonical definition that satisfies my understanding 
of the reality.

I've found several different descriptions, but none feel much like 
a definition beyond acronym expansion, and they disagree with each
other -- even the 3 TRs which were published simultaneously --

1. "RDF is a standard model for data interchange on the Web." 
   - <http://www.w3.org/RDF/>

2. "The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a framework for 
   representing information in the Web." 
   - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/>

3. "The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a language for 
   representing information about resources in the World Wide Web."
   - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/>

4. "The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a general-purpose 
   language for representing information in the Web." 
   - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/>

5. "The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a family of World 
   Wide Web Consortium (W3C) specifications originally designed 
   as a metadata data model. It has come to be used as a general 
   method for conceptual description or modeling of information 
   that is implemented in web resources, using a variety of syntax 
   - <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework>

Is there an existing authoritative answer (which maybe even the
most sacred historical electronic document might be updated to 
point to, even as it retains its operational definition in-line 
for historical context)?

Thanks for your help,


A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
        10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 14:22:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:58 UTC