W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:31:51 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QB7TT-0001Vq-KF@lowblow.w3.org>

RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/39

Raised by: Richard Cyganiak
On product: 

Dan Brickley said [1]:

“Would be nice in 2011+ if the URIs for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-synax-ns and nearby were a bit more human-friendly (RDFa? conneg?) and were around 2 clicks away from a community wiki...”

Ideally, the rdf: and rdfs: namespace would resolve to a nice content-negotiated resource with RDF/XML, Turtle, N-Triples, RDF/JSON and HTML+RDFa variants and versioning.

See [2], [3] and [4] for some guidance and implementations.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0258.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/
[4] http://neologism.deri.ie/
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2011 15:31:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT