W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update

From: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:06:31 -0400
Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <171285C6-EEC7-4B54-9C63-B81BF1D76B74@talis.com>
To: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
On Apr 20, 2011, at 13:04, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote:

> From: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com>
> Subject: [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:38:12 -0500
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Minutes for the FTF1 were not accepted on today's call due to two
>> separate email threads that resulted in -1 votes on the mailing list
>> after the meeting.  I took an action to add notes into the minutes to
>> point to those threads. 
>> 
>> 1)  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0366.html
>> 
>> This comment was added to 13 April's minutes:
>> [[
>> See post-FTF1 email discussion regarding this resolution at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0366.html
>> ]]
>> 
>> 2)  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0310.html
>> 
>> Nathan commented on a proposal which was not adopted, so I did not
>> change the minutes. 
>> 
>> My understanding is that the minutes now reflect both the meeting and
>> the post-meeting comments. 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
> 
> 
> Hmm.  The emails that I was thinking of are
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0307.html
> from Antoine Zimmermann, and 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0309.html
> from Lee Feigenbaum
> both of which have -1 on 
> PROPOSED: Mark xs:string as archaic for use in RDF, recommending use of 
> plain literals instead. Recommend that systems silently convert 
> xs:string data to plain literals.

It looks like those messages and the one I noted (from Lee, number 0366) are in the same thread.

> 
> In subsequence email, I tried to point out that there is an invalid
> assumption in the thread.  Nonetheless, the discussion should probably
> be noted in the F2F minutes, which I have done.

I agree.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> peter
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 13:07:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT