W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:07:50 +0100
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Message-Id: <7026BA74-F1D4-4244-A67D-562BCC0293C5@cyganiak.de>
To: antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr
On 8 Apr 2011, at 16:50, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> Then the question is, how do we define immutable g-boxes.

I already answered this further down in the same email:

>> <my-immutable-g-box>  { ... content of the immutable g-box ...}
>> 
>> <my-immutable-g-box>  a ex:VersionedSnapshot; ex:timestamp "2011-04-08"^^xsd:date
>> 
>> (where ex: is a use case specific vocabulary that we don't have to define in this WG)
>> 
>> For making explicit the triples inside a g-box (mutable or not), all you really need is the ability to write down <IRI, g-snap> pairs.

Best,
Richard
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 16:08:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT