W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:55:09 +0200
Message-Id: <90FC0C54-13F5-4B0E-8590-51DF10DF7C92@w3.org>
Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Pat,

sorry, but you will have to explain (me) what the problem is.

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman
web: http://www.ivan-herman.net
mobile: +31 64 1044 153

On 14 Apr 2011, at 18:43, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote:

> I note in passing that the Proposed WG Decision dated 14 April has the consequence that the IRi associated with a graph in SPARQL cannot be used inside an RDF triple to reliably refer to the graph. This means in particular that uses such as those contemplated in
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/RDF-Datasets-Proposal, which use the SPARQL name as the object in an 'imports' triple, are ruled out by this decision. 
> 
> Pat
> 
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:29 AM, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
>> 
>> ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/30
>> 
>> Raised by: 
>> On product: 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 16:55:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT