W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

ISSUE-7: Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:51:04 -0400
Message-ID: <20110414.105104.746976802093696273.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <david.wood@talis.com>
[TO hopefully get this onto tracker.]

From: "Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:48:47 -0400 (EDT)

>> rdf-plain-and-xml-literals: An XML literal without markup, e.g. "foo"
>> should denote the same thing as the plain literal "foo".
>> 
>> RESOLVE: Close (duplicate) - currently under discussion in RDF WG>
> 
> The RDF semantics indicate that the value space of rdf:XMLLiteral is
> disjoint from the set of Unicode strings. 
> 
> From RDF Concepts:
> 
> The value space is a set of entities, called XML values, which is:
> * disjoint from the lexical space;
> * disjoint from the value space of any XML schema datatype [XML-SCHEMA2];
> * disjoint from the set of Unicode character strings [UNICODE] strings;
> * and in 1:1 correspondence with the lexical space.
> 
> so 
> 
> RESOLVE: Close as NO!!!
> 
> I don't know why the last WG decided to punt here.
> 
> peter
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 14:51:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT