W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:30:25 +0100
Cc: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
Message-Id: <9917A6F4-A2F3-4010-9307-980B6DEF0975@cyganiak.de>
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Forwarding on behalf of Ian ...

Begin forwarded message:
> 
> Thanks Richard,
> 
> A very slight clarification is that the example I gave was from
> http://open.vocab.org/ but http://schemapedia.com/ uses the same style
> of RDF.
> 
> An example of one of schemapedia's embedded examples is:
> 
> http://schemapedia.com/examples/68740744ab36d400d81a1d1af23701e7.rdf
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wro=
> te:
> > I just had a conversation with Ian Davis on Twitter that yielded a use ca=
> se for defining datatype IRIs for graph literals. I thought I'd share it as=
>  input into ISSUE-5 [1].
> >
> > He uses Turtle snippets as literals in SchemaPedia [2]. SchemaPedia is a =
> site that helps find RDF vocabularies, and it lists example usage snippets =
> for the vocabularies. The site's back-end is RDF-based. Turtle literals are=
>  used to store the examples, as well as change events when examples are mod=
> ified. See [3] for a typical change event.
> >
> > Currently Ian uses plain literals, because no datatype was readily availa=
> ble.
> >
> > The idea of abusing Ivan's format URIs from [4] came up.
> >
> > Best,
> > Richard
> >
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/5
> > [2] http://schemapedia.com/
> > [3] http://api.talis.com/stores/openvocab/meta?about=3Dhttp://open.vocab.=
> org/changes/f07ca76699a536dd38b5cbbbe1ba181d&output=3Drdf
> > [4] http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/
> 
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 12:30:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT