W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:19:49 -0400
Message-ID: <20110405.111949.758577536498665156.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <tomac@google.com>
CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <hannes@muehleisen.org>
I think that it would be very useful to have as well some information on
the properties of the various transforms.  Some of this information is
already on the pages, but it would be useful to state whether each
transform is:

1/ lossy, 
   i.e., all the information in the RDF graph is contained in the JSON, 
2/ complete, 
   i.e., every RDF graph can be transformed into JSON,
3/ onto,
   i.e., every JSON document can be transformed into RDF by the inverse
   of the transform.

peter



From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
Subject: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 08:18:33 -0500

> Dear all,
> 
> In (hopefully) fulfillment of ACTION-20 [1], please find my JSON
> serializations lineup at [2]. It contains one relatively interesting
> sample graph [3] serialized as far as possible in the following
> formats: Linked Data API,
> JRON, JSN3, JSON-LD (CURIEs), JSON-LD (terms), JTriples, RDF/JSON,
> RDFj, SPARQL Query Results in JSON, Flat triples approach to RDF
> graphs in JSON.
> 
> It is the product of one long-haul flight and a long-haul train ride,
> the prior accompanied by Hannes Mühleisen (CC'ed, thanks for your
> help), and some sanity checks from Nathan, Manu, and Sandro (thanks,
> too). There will probably still be some bugs in there, but all JSON
> has been "linted" and in most cases double-checked. If you are a spec
> author of one of the serializations, feel free to check for
> correctness and please fix potential bugs. Concentration went down a
> little after t = t_airborne + 7 ;-)
> 
> I'll present some of my findings at the F2F during the JSON
> presentation after Matteo. Most (all?) of hit has been covered by
> Nathan's _excellent_ syntax options write-up [4] way before my work.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tom
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/20

> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON-Serialization-Examples#JSON_Serializations_Lineup

> [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON-Serialization-Examples#Shared_Example_for_Serialization_Lineup_.28Turtle.29

> [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON_Syntax_Options

> 
> -- 
> Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc.
> http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac

> 
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 15:20:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:41 GMT