- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:06:09 +0100
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
This is a housekeeping reply in order to file Dan's very useful link under ISSUE-27 (“Should we deprecate rdf:value?” [1]). On 10 Apr 2011, at 16:05, Dan Brickley wrote: > I made a fairly lengthy writeup of this > last year, filed under 'rdf:value', in anticipation of such WG > discussions. Details at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Jul/0252.html > > The M+S reification vocab is supposed to for describing statements > without them necessarily also being asserted; so using its 'rdf:value' > as part of a pattern for making n-ary claims was just downright > confusing. > > Ah well, better luck this time. Best, Richard [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/27
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2011 16:06:38 UTC