public-html@w3.org from April 2008 by author

Adele Peterson

• Re: tabindex="" feedback (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: <input type=search> and role=search (Monday, 31 March)

Al Gilman

• there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Monday, 7 April)

Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo

• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)

Andrew Emmons

• SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)

Andrew Sidwell

• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics) (Thursday, 17 April)
• Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable (Wednesday, 16 April)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• "in foreign content": end-of-file token (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Unicode error handling (was several messages about handling encodings in HTML) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

• Fw: WCAG 2.0 CR - W3C blog post and press release (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: <td scope> and <td> using headers+id> as Table Headers (Wednesday, 23 April)
• <td scope> and <td> using headers+id> as Table Headers (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Ben Boyle

• Re: Nested forms (Thursday, 24 April)
• Numbers and units (was Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references) (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• required radio buttons and checkboxes (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Sunday, 13 April)
• parsing html, xhtml, xml (svg and mathml) serialisations into a DOM (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: <anytag xml:size=10000>cvpwrbdvw</anytag> (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Wednesday, 2 April)

Benoit Piette

• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Bill Mason

• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Saturday, 19 April)

Bonner, Matt (IPG)

• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [whatwg] text/html for html and xhtml (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: meta content-language (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics) (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Event listener confusion (Thursday, 10 April)
• Event listener confusion (Thursday, 10 April)

Bruce Miller

• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Ca Phun Ung

• Re: Markup for names (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects (Tuesday, 15 April)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Opera, VoiceOver and alt (was: One more thought...) (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable (Friday, 25 April)
• Opera, VoiceOver and alt (was: One more thought...) (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• "Social engineering" Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: validity and other important things (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ... (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Whose problem Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• validity and other important things Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Chris Adams

• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image? (Wednesday, 16 April)

Chris Chiasson

• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Tuesday, 15 April)

Chris Wilson

• RE: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Friday, 25 April)
• RE: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) (Tuesday, 22 April)

Dailey, David P.

• RE: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Saturday, 19 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)

Dan Connolly

• XMLHttpRequest last call! comments due 2 June (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• refined list of HTML WG open issues (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (ISSUE-37 html-svg-mathml) (Thursday, 3 April)

Dana Lee Ling

• Re: SVG in text/html (Wednesday, 16 April)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5 (Tuesday, 1 April)

Dannii

• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)

Dave Singer

• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: validity and other important things (Friday, 11 April)

David Carlisle

• Re: MathML entities don't degrade gracefully (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: MathML entities don't degrade gracefully (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: MathML entities don't degrade gracefully (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics) (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: rendering of control characters, was:: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: rendering of control characters, was:: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Friday, 11 April)
• rendering of control characters, was:: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: The mapping of phi (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: HTML/MathML integration (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: HTML/MathML integration (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

David Dailey

• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image? (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Tuesday, 1 April)

David Poehlman

• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Point of clarification in alt debate(s) (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ... (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: validity and other important things Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

David Woolley

• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics) (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (Tuesday, 15 April)

Dmitry Turin

• Re[2]: <anytag xml:size=10000>cvpwrbdvw</anytag> (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: <anytag xml:size=10000>cvpwrbdvw</anytag> (Wednesday, 2 April)
• <anytag xml:size=10000>cvpwrbdvw</anytag> (Tuesday, 1 April)

Doug Schepers

• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Point of Extensibility (was: An observation on the MathML discussion, was: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML, was: SVG in text/html, was: Point of Extensibility) (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

• Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: SVG in HTML Review Comments (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)

Eirik Mikkelsen

• Re: Point of Extensibility (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)

Elliotte Harold

• Re: The mapping of phi (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: The mapping of phi (Wednesday, 2 April)

fantasai

• Re: [whatwg] several messages about quotations (Saturday, 12 April)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• reality check (was: Re: The ins and del elements and comments thereon) (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)

Harry Loots

• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)

Henri Sivonen

• Number of error when EOF inside 'SYSTEM' or 'PUBLIC' (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: EOF in new tokenizer states (Sunday, 27 April)
• EOF in new tokenizer states (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: MathML entities don't degrade gracefully (Friday, 25 April)
• MathML entities don't degrade gracefully (Thursday, 24 April)
• Authoring requirements and default values with progress and meter (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Nested forms (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Nested forms (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: meta content-language (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• meta content-language (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Effect of bogus lang on determining natural language (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Extensibility vs. supporting SVG and MathML (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: In body other end tag handling convoluted to get at most one error (Friday, 4 April)
• In body other end tag handling convoluted to get at most one error (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Extensibility vs. supporting SVG and MathML (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Rename 'irrelevant' to 'hidden'? (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: parsing html, xhtml, xml (svg and mathml) serialisations into a DOM (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: parsing html, xhtml, xml (svg and mathml) serialisations into a DOM (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-40 (style-attr-vs-css): Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5 [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-39 (style-attr-vs-css): Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5 [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 4 April)

Ian Hickson

• <font> and style="" in HTML5 (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: Comments on "origin" (data: and image) (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: postMessage feedback (Sunday, 27 April)
• postMessage feedback (Thursday, 24 April)
• tabindex="" feedback (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: <td scope> and <td> using headers+id> as Table Headers (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: reality check (was: Re: The ins and del elements and comments thereon) (Thursday, 17 April)
• The ins and del elements and comments thereon (Thursday, 17 April)
• Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5 (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Markup for names (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: several messages about quotations (Saturday, 12 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: rendering of control characters, was:: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Thursday, 10 April)
• Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Event listener confusion (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5 (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Ivan Enderlin

• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

j.j.

• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Thursday, 17 April)

James Graham

• Re: Collecting of data about alt usage (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: testing the theory that required alt = bad (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Collecting of data about alt usage (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)

Jan Richards

• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Jeff Schiller

• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• SVG in HTML Review Comments (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Please add rel="timesheet" (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Jeff Walden

• Re: postMessage feedback (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: postMessage feedback (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: postMessage feedback (Saturday, 26 April)

Jens Meiert

• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Monday, 21 April)

Jim Jewett

• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Thursday, 17 April)
• new variant proposal on alt=? issues (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: HTML/MathML integration (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: HTML/MathML integration (Tuesday, 1 April)
• HTML/MathML integration (Tuesday, 1 April)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Monday, 14 April)

John Cowan

• Re: UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences (Friday, 11 April)

John Foliot

• RE: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• More effective approaches? (was RE: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Is this an accurate reflection of where we stand today? (was RE: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: The Philosophy of @alt (was [html4all] several messages about alt) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Saturday, 12 April)
• RE: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

John-Mark Bell

• Parsing: CDATA section processing (Sunday, 6 April)

Jon Gibbins (dotjay)

• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Wednesday, 23 April)

Jon Gunderson

• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices and validation behaviour (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

juan@canonicalscience.com

• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Monday, 14 April)

Jukka K. Korpela

• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) (Tuesday, 15 April)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• XML in HTML back 10 years ago (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Extensibility vs. supporting SVG and MathML (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Extensibility vs. supporting SVG and MathML (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: HTML/MathML integration (Tuesday, 1 April)
• An observation on the MathML discussion, was: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Tuesday, 1 April)

Justin James

• RE: Point of clarification in alt debate(s) (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)
• RE: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Tuesday, 1 April)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Tuesday, 1 April)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Krzysztof Żelechowski

• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)

Křištof Želechovski

• RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Tuesday, 29 April)
• RE: [whatwg] text/html for html and xhtml (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Sunday, 27 April)

L. David Baron

• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: HTML semantics and file system (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Browser defaults should please the mass of authors (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Laura Carlson

• Re: alt and authoring practices (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: [html4all] Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: [html4all] On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools] (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)

Laurens Holst

• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Lee Kowalkowski

• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Monday, 21 April)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: [whatwg] several messages about quotations (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: validity and other important things (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Sunday, 6 April)

liorean

• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics) (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: [whatwg] postMessage feedback (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: postMessage feedback (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Basing conformance for accessibility questions on subjective determinations (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)

Marghanita da Cruz

• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Image/Video/Audio Metadata (an alternative perspective of alt text) (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: Conway's Law [was: Point of Extensibility] (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Wednesday, 2 April)

Mark Davis

• Re: UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences (Friday, 11 April)
• UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences (Friday, 11 April)

Martin Atkins

• Re: postMessage feedback (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)

Matt Morgan-May

• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Maurice

• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Thursday, 24 April)

Michael A. Puls II

• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Reinitializing OBJECT and EMBED - data and type changes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 10 April)

Michael Kohlhase

• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Michael(tm) Smith

• IE and document.write [was: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML] (Wednesday, 30 April)
• IE8 parsing and xmlns [was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics] (Wednesday, 30 April)
• make that issue-38.. [was: Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5] (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Definition of the style attribute in HTML 5 (Friday, 4 April)
• Conway's Law [was: Point of Extensibility] (Friday, 4 April)
• {minutes} 2008-04-03 HTML WG telcon (Thursday, 3 April)

Mikko Rantalainen

• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) (Tuesday, 15 April)

Neil Soiffer

• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: The mapping of phi (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: The mapping of phi (was: Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: HTML/MathML integration (Tuesday, 1 April)
• hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: <semantics> (was Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Nicholas Shanks

• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Wednesday, 23 April)

Olivier G.

• Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image? (Wednesday, 16 April)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Markup for names (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Collecting of data about alt usage (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section -- metadata embedded in image? (Tuesday, 15 April)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: <font> and style="" in HTML5 (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Monday, 21 April)

Patty Kostkova

• new post: Research Assistant/ Research Fellow in Online Community Building and Web 2.0 for the Medicines Support Unit for Optometrists: Closing Date: 18 April 2008 (Wednesday, 2 April)

Paul Libbrecht

• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)

Peter Krantz

• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Saturday, 12 April)

Philip Taylor

• Canvas ImageData comments (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Canvas arcTo comments (Sunday, 27 April)
• Canvas arc comments (Sunday, 27 April)
• Canvas security comments (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: Nested forms (Saturday, 26 April)
• Canvas shadows should not be optional (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Nested forms (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Tuesday, 1 April)

Robert Miner

• RE: The mapping of phi (Wednesday, 2 April)
• RE: HTML/MathML integration (Tuesday, 1 April)

Sam Ruby

• xml:lang attribute in HTML documents (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Point of Extensibility (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• RE: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Samuel Santos

• HTML semantics and file system (Monday, 28 April)

Schnabel, Stefan

• RE: alt and authoring practices (Friday, 18 April)

scott lewis

• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Simon Pieters

• Parsing: [R]CDATA algorithm lacks namespace (Friday, 18 April)
• Parsing: <h4> in foreign content (Thursday, 10 April)
• Syntax: omitting <html> when it's followed by whitespace (Saturday, 5 April)
• xmlns talisman on HTML fragments in SVG/MathML (Saturday, 5 April)
• Parsing: <noframes> before <frameset> (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)

Smylers

• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Numbers and units (was Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references) (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Feeedback on <dfn>, <abbr>, and other elements related to cross-references (Monday, 21 April)

Stan Devitt

• RE: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com

• RE: tabindex="" feedback (Thursday, 24 April)

Steve Axthelm

• Re: alt and authoring practices (Friday, 18 April)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: [html4all] Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: testing the theory that required alt = bad (Thursday, 17 April)
• testing the theory that required alt = bad (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools] (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5 (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5 (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Monday, 14 April)
• On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Point of clarification in alt debate(s) (Monday, 14 April)
• Point of clarification in alt debate(s) (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative (Friday, 11 April)
• Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

T.V Raman

• Re: Use-case for where alt text would be truly unavailable (Wednesday, 16 April)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Saturday, 5 April)

Tina Holmboe

• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects (Tuesday, 15 April)

Tomas Caspers

• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)

Waters, Michael, Springer US

• RE: hand authoring web pages (was Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML) (Tuesday, 1 April)

Weston Ruter

• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 23 April)

William F Hammond

• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: text/html for html and xhtml (Friday, 18 April)
• text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics) (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML (Tuesday, 1 April)

Øistein E. Andersen

• Re: UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: UTC Agenda Item: Recommendations for handling ill-formed sequences (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Unicode error handling (was several messages about handling encodings in HTML) (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: Unicode error handling (was several messages about handling encodings in HTML) (Monday, 7 April)

矢倉 眞隆

• Re: Markup for names (Wednesday, 16 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:53:29 UTC