W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2008

Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:13:50 +0200
To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <alfred.s.gilman@ieee.org>
Cc: "Steve Faulkner" <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, wai-xtech@w3.org, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t9fypcttwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:28:09 +0200, Laura Carlson  
<laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:

> How can an HTMLWG open issue be closed if it already has an action
> item is bound to it and that action item is in progress?
...

By consensus of the working group - something that has clearly not been  
achieved yet.

> Just minutes after that, Dan sent a message to html-public that said:
> "I'm inclined to let 'open' mean we have a clear plan or next step for
> working on it, vs 'raised"' which means it's probably an issue but
> nobody has volunteered to address it or move it forward." [9]
>
> So I ask, how can issue 31 be closed if it already has an action item
> 54 bound to it and that action item is in progress and has volunteers?

Looks like an administrative error to me. Reopening for now.

chaals


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals   Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 10:15:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:14 GMT