On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Jirka Kosek wrote: > > But I have to say, that I still don't see advantages of implanting SVG, > MathML and user defined data into HTML serialization. This will make > parsing even more complex, additional constraints on SVG and MathML > content in HTML must be obeyed, etc. This will not simplify anything, it > will just make HTML syntax and parsing bigger mess. > > While not simply allow such features only in XML serialization where XML > namespaces could do the job without introducing any new features? HTML > serialization will remain easier and will be there for handling legacy > stuff and for people who want to create simple webpages without worrying > about missing closed tag. But if anyone wants by hand create MathML, > SVG, user defined markup he/she is for sure enough capable to work also > with XML syntax. I actually completely agree with the above viewpoint, but there was overwhelming support for MathML and SVG in text/html and there were some strong arguments put forward to support the requests. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 19:52:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:14 GMT