Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> Saying that such products should be >> programmed to output invalid HTML isn't a viable answer, either. > > Why not? Almost *every* tool I know of that produces HTML produces invalid > HTML, so I am not sure how you determine that there is some existential > reason why this cannot happen. Are you serious, Charles ? Are you really arguing that the generating of invalid code is an acceptable option ? If so, I would seriously suggest you move a motion to disolve the W3C, since it would have no role whatsoever in the anarchic world that you appear to be willing to tolerate. Phiip TAYLORReceived on Friday, 11 April 2008 10:22:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:10 GMT