W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2008

Re: HTML/MathML integration

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:29:46 +0200
Message-ID: <47F2710A.50504@gmx.de>
To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
CC: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org, www-math@w3.org

Jim Jewett wrote:
> ...
> The decision needs to be specified.  And in html, the short "invalid"
> form should probably be acceptable, representing the simpler case.
> (You can always be explicit to get the other case.)  If mathml needs
> to keep it invalid (to ensure quality), then maybe the two languages
> aren't ready for tight integration.
> ...

For the record: I totally disagree that it needs to be specified. If 
it's not specified in MathML, so be it.

All of this smells like an attempt to impose "WHATWG" design on MathML.

BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2008 17:30:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:32 UTC