W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2008

RE: [whatwg] text/html for html and xhtml

From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:00:10 +0200
To: "'Boris Zbarsky'" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "'William F Hammond'" <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>, <whatwg@whatwg.org>, <public-html@w3.org>, <www-math@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004e01c8a972$dc039f90$4d01010a@IBM42F76C011DF>

If the server infers the MIME type from content and sends it over HTTP as it
should, you can have both.
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Boris Zbarsky
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 6:10 AM
To: William F Hammond
Cc: www-svg@w3.org; whatwg@whatwg.org; public-html@w3.org; www-math@w3.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] text/html for html and xhtml

William F Hammond wrote:
> Or, if that is too hard or too politically difficult,
> going forward the WG should provide a formula for the front of a
> document that asks for an xhtml parse.

What is the benefit over using a MIME type as now, though?

-Boris
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 21:31:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:54 UTC