On Apr 22, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:28:30 +0200, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com > > wrote: >> Out of curiousity, why does this draft refer to the SQL API but not >> the storage interface? Is storage not also a solution to local >> data storage? > > It is. I think it was because these features (SQL and offline) were > specifically introduced for offline Web applications. > > I suppose we could add another section covering that. What do people > think? If I recall correctly, the original motivation for this document was to enable wider review of the SQL and offline app features. I think covering other related features (storage, navigator.onLine, online/ offline events) would make it more useful to a wider audience, so it seems like a helpful thing to do. Regards, MaciejReceived on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 23:26:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:30 GMT