Removal of XML/Schema Validation Transforms
Tweak to Schema
WWW2002 CFP
Should we define a "critical" flag for ds:Object
Clarification on 4.4.4
XML Signature schema implementation
Fw: Re:Call for Review: XML Digital Signature is a W3C Proposed Recommendation
X509SubjectName and binary values
Re: latest draft xmldsig
xml/digsig mime type?
Re : Graphic Card Offer From Manufacturer
Comment from PR Review: Is XML1.0 parsing well-formed or validating?
Signature overview - minor additional modifications
Comments for PR-xmldsig-core-20010820
Join the fight to quality. Make 36 Annually secured
Error in DSAKeyValue DTD/Schema
RE: FW: Base64
Schema Validation Transform
- Re: Schema Validation Transform
- Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
- Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
- Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
- Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
- RE: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
- Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
- Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
- Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
- RE: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
- Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
- RE: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
- Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
- Re: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
Same-document reference
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-01.txt
How to multi-sign?
How to multi-sign?
Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
- Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
- Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
W3C Proposed Recommendation:
CFP: Submission deadline for NDSS'02 extended to Aug 29th
signature overview question/comment
- RE: signature overview question/comment
- RE: signature overview question/comment
- Re: signature overview question/comment
Typo in 6.6.3 XPath Filtering
Interruptions of Service
Quick question on XSLT transform
Tweaked Section 6.4.1
Comments requested on ETSI Draft TR "XML format for signature policies"
Problem with indentation
RE: Base64
a typo in section 6.4.1 ?
XPath Expression
- Re: XPath Expression
- RE: XPath Expression
- Re: XPath Expression
- RE: XPath Expression
- RE: XPath Expression
Issues Closed and Moving Forward
Question: Transform Nodeset Input
Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input
Join the Middle Class Rich!
Minutes of 2001-07-30 Teleconf
Questions about c14n implementation
Comment on Exclusive Canonicalization
clarifications on XML Schema base64Binary type
XSLT and Schema Processing Model within XMLDSIG
C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
- RE: C14N Argument
Surreptitious Forwarding
xmldsig Call 13:00 EST July 30
Python Canonical XML
What's a relative Namespace URI?
Canonical XML implementation
Publication of Draft ETSI TS "XML Advanced Electronic Signatures" for public comment: CORRECT LINK: STF178Task3Draft.pdf
Publication of Draft ETSI TS on XML Advanced Electronic Signatures for public comment
Note Well
Note Well
Editorial problem in Section 4.2 of digital signature spec
ID/DTD/c14n/dsig mischief?
xfdl and xfa
Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
- RE: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
- Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
- Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
Section 4.3.3.2
initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
- Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
- Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
- Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
- RE: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
- Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
- RE: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
Re: CDATA vs. EMPTY
Another solution to Reference Properties
SPKIData.ANY
Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
- Re: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
- RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
- RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
- RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
- RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
- RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
- Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
- Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
- RE: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
- Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
- RE: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference