- From: Amir Herzberg <AMIR@newgenpay.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:49:33 +0300
- To: "Dsig (E-mail)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Hi all,
In message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001JulSep/0165.html,
Joseph adopted a minor modification I suggested to the `shorthand`
introduced and used by Don to provide high-level description of DSIG
appearing in the spec.
I later looked at the `shorthand` Don used for XML Encryption, and I noticed
some minor differences.
Let me offer some new text to describe the shorthand and a slightly improved
shorthand version, to be consistent btw DSIG and XML Encrypt and well
defined:
We show below, in a simplified, `shorthand` notation, the structure of DSIG
signatures. Elements appear zero or more times if followed by "*", zero or
once if followed by "?" and once or more if followed by "+". When not
followed by a symbol, elements appear exactly once. Attributes were removed,
as well as the contents and end tag of some elements.
<Signature>
<SignedInfo>
<CanonicalizationMethod/>
<SignatureMethod/>
<Reference>
<Transforms>?
<DigestMethod/>
<DigestValue/>
</Reference>+
</SignedInfo>
<SignatureValue/>
<KeyInfo>?
<Object>*
</Signature>
Best regards,
Amir Herzberg
CTO, NewGenPay Inc.
http://www.newgenpay.com/Amir/Herzberg.htm
SMS (urgent only!): _subject_ of email to aherzberg@walla.co.il
Received on Monday, 3 September 2001 05:50:04 UTC