- From: Amir Herzberg <AMIR@newgenpay.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:49:33 +0300
- To: "Dsig (E-mail)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Hi all, In message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001JulSep/0165.html, Joseph adopted a minor modification I suggested to the `shorthand` introduced and used by Don to provide high-level description of DSIG appearing in the spec. I later looked at the `shorthand` Don used for XML Encryption, and I noticed some minor differences. Let me offer some new text to describe the shorthand and a slightly improved shorthand version, to be consistent btw DSIG and XML Encrypt and well defined: We show below, in a simplified, `shorthand` notation, the structure of DSIG signatures. Elements appear zero or more times if followed by "*", zero or once if followed by "?" and once or more if followed by "+". When not followed by a symbol, elements appear exactly once. Attributes were removed, as well as the contents and end tag of some elements. <Signature> <SignedInfo> <CanonicalizationMethod/> <SignatureMethod/> <Reference> <Transforms>? <DigestMethod/> <DigestValue/> </Reference>+ </SignedInfo> <SignatureValue/> <KeyInfo>? <Object>* </Signature> Best regards, Amir Herzberg CTO, NewGenPay Inc. http://www.newgenpay.com/Amir/Herzberg.htm SMS (urgent only!): _subject_ of email to aherzberg@walla.co.il
Received on Monday, 3 September 2001 05:50:04 UTC