- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:03:07 -0400
- To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
On Thursday 30 August 2001 10:57, merlin wrote: > Speaking of which, is a single schema child sufficient? > If we are to support explicit schema in any form, then > we really need to support several; a document may involve > multiple namespaces with a corresponding multiplicity of > schemata. Or does schema support this in some manner? That's what that sentence is *supposed* to answer [1]. If you want to do multiple validations, use multiple transforms. If the schema have complex relationships between them, build your relationship with includes imports and the like. [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-SchemaValidation ... the ordered application of multiple schema validations may require multiple Transforms.... No special provision is made for the identification of a remote stylesheet at a given URI because it can be communicated via an xsd:include or xsd:import within the schema child of the Transform.
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 12:04:14 UTC