- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:00:19 -0400
- To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
On Thursday 27 September 2001 09:39 am, merlin wrote: > and clarifying in the spec how implicit parsing > should be performed (well formed?). This has been reflected in: http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-ReferenceProcessingModel o If the data object is an octet stream and the next transform requires a node-set, the signature application MUST attempt to parse the octets yielding the required node-set /+via [XML] well-formed processing.+/ o If the data object is a node-set and the next transform requires octets, the signature application MUST attempt to convert the node-set to an octet stream /+using Canonical XML [XML-C14N].+/ I'm not convinced the latter addition (using C14N) is completely right though, but I think it is.
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2001 11:00:22 UTC