Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)

Hi Joseph,

Here goes; schema validation transform example; untried, untested, etc.


>On Monday 27 August 2001 20:21, Dournaee, Blake wrote:
>> I see no qualifier (RQUIRED, RECOMMENDED, OPTIONAL) for the schema
>> validation transform that is mentioned in the latest PR for XML Dsig. What
>> is the status of this? Did I just miss it?
>We can call it optional if we can get interop on an example of this as an 
>explicit transform. Anyone want to send an example to the list?

Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct,  special,  indirect 
or consequential  damages  arising  from  alteration of  the contents of this
message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on.

In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to
promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or
appearance at trade shows and conferences.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.

Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 13:07:45 UTC