- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:57:34 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
r/reagle@w3.org/2001.08.28/16:41:55 >On Tuesday 28 August 2001 05:39, merlin wrote: >> 6.6.6 (always fortuitous to see) Schema Validation >> You have some text relating to XSLT at the end of the first paragraph. > >Ah, right, should say "schema child". Fixed. Speaking of which, is a single schema child sufficient? If we are to support explicit schema in any form, then we really need to support several; a document may involve multiple namespaces with a corresponding multiplicity of schemata. Or does schema support this in some manner? Merlin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or appearance at trade shows and conferences. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 10:58:23 UTC