Re: comments on current xml dsig draft

At 23:53 7/2/2001, Dournaee, Blake wrote:
>the number of <Reference> elements in <SignedInfo>. Shouldn't one run of
>C14N be enough to canonicalize the signed info?

Yes, that is the intent. I've tweaked [1] to express this intent better.

$Revision: 1.91 $ on $Date: 2001/07/03 13:43:49 $ by $Author: reagle $

Joseph Reagle Jr.       
W3C Policy Analyst      
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair
W3C XML Encryption Chair

Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2001 09:44:29 UTC