Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section

At 11:28 7/11/2001, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>Regardless of how things come out with what we recommend
>for base64, I suggest the addition of some material in
>3.2 Core Validation as show in the attachment.


Instead of repeatedly spreading it out, it's not text as the top of the 
validation section:
revision: 1.103
>3.2 Core Validation
>Comparison of values in reference and signature validation
>are over the numeric or decoded octet sequence of the value.
>Different implementations may produce different encoded digest and
>signature values when processing the same resources because of
>variances in their encoding, such as accidental white space.

However, what do you mean by numeric *or* decoded octet?

Joseph Reagle Jr.       
W3C Policy Analyst      
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair
W3C XML Encryption Chair

Received on Friday, 27 July 2001 17:05:56 UTC