Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft

At 18:42 7/15/2001, merlin wrote:
>parameter encoding. The &exc; document is not tied to &dsig; and really
>doesn't need to know how it will be encoded.

That's true, but I think my preference is not to spread out things if it can 
be helped, consequently I'd prefer a section in the exclusive that states 
how it could be used with disgi.

Joseph Reagle Jr.       
W3C Policy Analyst      
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair
W3C XML Encryption Chair

Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 13:30:38 UTC