Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft

At 18:42 7/15/2001, merlin wrote:
>parameter encoding. The &exc; document is not tied to &dsig; and really
>doesn't need to know how it will be encoded.

That's true, but I think my preference is not to spread out things if it can 
be helped, consequently I'd prefer a section in the exclusive that states 
how it could be used with disgi.


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 13:30:38 UTC