- From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 17:57:12 +0200
- To: Gregor Karlinger <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Hi Gregor, >> >> 2. Question: How did you check the 3rd processor requirement: >> >> "Implementations MUST NOT be implemented with an XML parser that >> >> converts relative URIs to absolute URIs." . How should a parser (like >> >> Xerces) convert a URI? Does a parser understands what a URI is? >> Question to IBM and IAIK: How did you test this behaviour? > > Our C14n implementation scans through all namespace nodes of the input > nodeset and tests if any of them has a relative URI as its value. If > yes, a C14N exception will be thrown. Yes, I do so, too. BTW, only in the input nodeset of in the complete document? I thought about the 3rd processor requirement in [1], not the one about relative NS URIs (the 2nd requirement) , but about conversion of general URIs (what ever this is). [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop.html Regards, Christian
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 12:01:45 UTC