- From: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:11:25 -0400
- To: "john" (by way of Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>) <cmj@cht.com.tw>
- cc: lde008@dma.isg.mot.com, XML Signature WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Hi, Not sure why you see this as a problem. For protocol type applications, your protocol message can contain as many signature elements as you need, each signing whatever data elements and/or other signature elements that are appropriate. If you have a document application where you want to put all the signatures inside the document and have each sign the "whole" document, then each signature needs appropriate transforms carving out at least itself and all signatures to be added after it... Donald From: "john" <cmj@cht.com.tw>(by way of Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:12:45 -0400 To: XML Signature WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> Message-Id: <20010823151245.D1D2087569@policy.w3.org> >Dear xmldsig WG, > After reviewing RFC 3075:XML-Signature Syntax and Processing, I don't > think it can process a multi-signature which requires several signatories > signing the same document. Can xmldsig do that? > >cheers, > > John m.j. ================================================================== Donald Eastlake 3rd +1 508-634-2066(h) dee3@torque.pothole.com 155 Beaver Street +1 508-261-5434(w) lde008@dma.isg.mot.com Milford, MA 01757 USA
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2001 12:11:36 UTC