- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:28:44 -0400
- To: "Dournaee, Blake" <bdournaee@rsasecurity.com>
- Cc: "'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 17:24 7/27/2001, Dournaee, Blake wrote: >"Canonicalization is used implicitly when a node-set is converted to an >octet stream in the transformation pipeline. Care should be made not to >include it unnecessarily as an explicit transform. Doing so may affect core >processing performance." Hrmm... I don't want to encourage not using it explicitly. If I have a <Transform Algorithm="&xpath;">some Xpath</Transform> <Transform Algorithm="$c14n;"/> Then exactly 1 canonicalization was done, the explicit one. (Could you given an example of a mistaken double c14n (implicit/explicit)?) -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 27 July 2001 17:28:50 UTC