Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:

Hi Joseph,

r/reagle@w3.org/2001.08.30/12:03:07
>On Thursday 30 August 2001 10:57, merlin wrote:
>> Speaking of which, is a single schema child sufficient?
>> [...]
>
>That's what that sentence is *supposed* to answer [1]. If you want to do 
>multiple validations, use multiple transforms. If the schema have complex 
>relationships between them, build your relationship with includes imports and 
>the like.

I understand this. However, use of import/include requires me to reference
an external schema which may not be available. Using multiple transforms
is not equivalent to explicitly including all the relevant schemata in
a single transform. I cannot search for other validation transforms that
include a required schema, however I can search through multiple children
that may provide it.

It basically seems to me that support for a single schema child goes only
half way.  I am probably wrong, but the two meaningful options seem,
to me, either not to support any explicit schema child, or to support
multiple children. Very Irish of me, I know.

Merlin


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct,  special,  indirect 
or consequential  damages  arising  from  alteration of  the contents of this
message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on.

In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to
promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or
appearance at trade shows and conferences.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.
   http://www.baltimore.com

Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 12:31:41 UTC