- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:52:33 -0400
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
I've taken a stab and tweaking the text of XSLT, and including a similar section on Schema. (I know the formatting isn't, but I want to send this before I have to run.) Presently it states: http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-XSLT >6.6.5 XSLT Transform >Use of the XSLT transform without any parameters indicates that any in-line >XSLT within the resource being processed should occur (see examplein [XSLT, >2.3]). Use of a namespace-qualified stylesheet element, which MUST be the >sole child of the Transform element, indicates that the specified style >sheet processing should occur; whether this instantiates in-line processing >as well is determined by the XSLT processing model. No special provision is >made for the identification of a remote stylesheet at a given URI because >it can be communicate via an xml:include or xsl:import within a stylesheet >child of the Transform. I wonder in the XSLT or schema case (which has similar text), if this is correct, or if we can say anything more " is determined by the XSLT processing model" which respect to being clear about the order of processing that might occur? -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 17:52:36 UTC