- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 18:45:03 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20010906174504.F060244FD0@yog-sothoth.ie.baltimore.com>
And a test with an explicit inline schema. Untested, etc. WRT the PR review comment, it seems inconsistent that we say *don't* schema validate, but *maybe* DTD validate. I know that this has been a question from at least one customer, so some clarification might be in order. I'd vote for *don't* validate against an external DTD either. We've nailed down implicit serialization (c14n); implicit parsing might be good too. Merlin r/reagle@w3.org/2001.09.04/15:06:45 >We can call it optional if we can get interop on an example of this as an >explicit transform. Anyone want to send an example to the list? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or appearance at trade shows and conferences. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: merlin-xmldsig-twenty-one.tar.gz
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 13:45:49 UTC