Conforming to WCAG 2.0 SC 2.4.5 (Multiple Ways) for pdf files
- Re: Conforming to WCAG 2.0 SC 2.4.5 (Multiple Ways) for pdf files
- RE: Conforming to WCAG 2.0 SC 2.4.5 (Multiple Ways) for pdf files
Single Page Architecture: Best Practices For Form Error Handling
[CSSWG][css-content] FPWD of CSS Generated Content L3
Announcing the Research Questions Task Force
The Professional Certificate in Web Accessibility is now enrolling
content in document twice but displayed once
Accessible Documents - PDF vs. HTML
- Re: Accessible Documents - PDF vs. HTML
- Re: Accessible Documents - PDF vs. HTML
- RE: Accessible Documents - PDF vs. HTML
- Re: Accessible Documents - PDF vs. HTML
AW: Names for ARIA menu and menubar
Single Page Architecture General Concepts
Mobility Impairment Accessibility Study
AW: Names for ARIA menu and menubar
Names for ARIA menu and menubar
Knowbility OpenAIR Competition - Mentors Needed - Experienced Accessibility Professionals
Creating personas for WAI site redesign
- Re: Creating personas for WAI site redesign
FW: PRESS RELEASE: G3ict and World ENABLED Launch Accessible Smart Cities Initiative
ATAG 2.0 compliant WYSIWYG editors
Reminder -- Call for Review: Web Accessibility Perspectives
WAI-ARIA design pattern for media players
Accessibility of Archieved items
New Accessible Playlist Community Group
audio description on demand service seeking testing.
accessible drop-down menus
- RE: accessible drop-down menus
Minutes of 27 May and updates to work for this week
Text entry box with a single underline...
- Re: Text entry box with a single underline...
- RE: Text entry box with a single underline...
- Re: Text entry box with a single underline...
- Re: Text entry box with a single underline...
- RE: Text entry box with a single underline...
Re: [WebAIM] Elderly and self identification as having a disability
RE: Elderly and self-identification as having a disability
Elderly and self identification as having a disability
Request for feedback: Navigation and image maps
AHG 2016: Call for Proposals ends in 8 days
Disabled people and copyright infringement
- RE: Disabled people and copyright infringement
- Re: Disabled people and copyright infringement
- RE: Disabled people and copyright infringement
AccessWorks on GAAD
Inclusive Design 24
Resources for GAAD and beyond
Call for Review: Web Accessibility Perspectives
New Videos: Perspectives on Web Accessibility -- Essential for Some, Useful for All
Screen Reader Survey for User Research Class
- Re: Screen Reader Survey for User Research Class
Assistive Technology (AT) survey
paypal.
warning category for techniques / failures.
- Re: warning category for techniques / failures.
- Re: warning category for techniques / failures.
- Re: warning category for techniques / failures.
- Re: warning category for techniques / failures.
- Re: warning category for techniques / failures.
HTML (Accessibility) Bug Triage Meeting - Upcoming: Thursday, 5th May
Call for review and comment: EPUB Accessibility: Conformance and Discovery
RE: Not hearing grouping labels for checkboxes, radio buttons and link lists.
Not hearing grouping labels for checkboxes, radio buttons and link lists.
- Re: Not hearing grouping labels for checkboxes, radio buttons and link lists.
- RE: Not hearing grouping labels for checkboxes, radio buttons and link lists.
RE: In WCAG NEXT let's put a date field on failures
- Re: In WCAG NEXT let's put a date field on failures
- Re: In WCAG NEXT let's put a date field on failures
- Re: Re: In WCAG NEXT let's put a date field on failures
- Re: In WCAG NEXT let's put a date field on failures
Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re[2]: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- RE: Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re[2]: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
- Re: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques
ASSETS 2016 [Deadlines of 24 June]: Posters and Demos, Experience Reports, Doctoral Consortium, and Student Research Competition
WCAG Next Possible Models
WCAG Next Possible Models
Problem: The W3 Wiki enlarges very poorly.
The Professional Certificate in Web Accessibility is now enrolling
WCAG Next Possible Models
An accessible interface for data mining
WCAG. next (of interesting note)
Re: Accessible eLearning
Seeking example of quality alt text in STEM book
FW: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
RE: Agenda: HTML bug triage
Authroing tools and WAI guidelines (was RE: Straw man list for WCAG.NEXT, another proposal...)
RE: WCAG Next Possible Models [OFFICIAL]
RE: Straw man list for WCAG.NEXT, another proposal...
- RE: Straw man list for WCAG.NEXT, another proposal...
- Re: Straw man list for WCAG.NEXT, another proposal...
- RE: Straw man list for WCAG.NEXT, another proposal...
- RE: Straw man list for WCAG.NEXT, another proposal...
Call for Proposals: Accessing Higher Ground 2016
WCAG Next Possible Models
WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: WCAG Next Possible Models
- Re: WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: WCAG Next Possible Models
- Re: WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: WCAG Next Possible Models
- Re: WCAG Next Possible Models
- Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- Re: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- Re: WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next PossibleModels
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next PossibleModels
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next PossibleModels
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next PossibleModels
- RE: WCAG Next Possible Models
- Re: WCAG Next Possible Models
- RE: Regulatory / Government requirements for - WCAG Next Possible Models
- Re: WCAG Next Possible Models
- Re: WCAG Next Possible Models
ASSETS 2016 - Call for Papers - Deadline: May 6th, 2016
Accessibility for trustworthiness indicators
- Re: Accessibility for trustworthiness indicators
- RE: Accessibility for trustworthiness indicators
- Re: Accessibility for trustworthiness indicators