W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2016

Re: Accessible Documents - PDF vs. HTML

From: <deborah.kaplan@suberic.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:46:44 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
To: Olaf Drümmer <olaflist@callassoftware.com>
cc: w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.20.1606161044410.14356@gratuity>
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Olaf Drümmer wrote:

>> On 15.06.2016, at 15:51, deborah.kaplan@suberic.net wrote:
>> then it is fairly cheap and easy to create either inaccessible tagged PDF or accessible HTML
> what would this (at least to me) seemingly weird statement be based on?


This is what we in the Dragon NaturallySpeaking world sometimes call "an uncaught taco". That should have read "... then it is fairly cheap and easy to create an accessible tagged PDF or an accessible HTML."

I do try to proofread, really. But it's hard, because everything that comes out of NaturallySpeaking is in fact grammatically correct English. It's just sometimes grammatically correct word salad. Sorry about that.

Deborah Kaplan
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2016 14:47:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:58 UTC