- From: Thad C <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:57:53 -0700
- To: Olaf Drümmer <olaflist@callassoftware.com>
- Cc: "J. Albert Bowden" <jalbertbowden@gmail.com>, "<w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOh2y+9epG4=zjJ-Ud-prXFXsXLnvo6M06QApyvWEv91o+5aVw@mail.gmail.com>
If I am reading the original question correctly it is coming from the perspective of someone that is involved in a project and is asking a question related to the approach of building this sysytem. On Jun 15, 2016 11:05 PM, "Olaf Drümmer" <olaflist@callassoftware.com> wrote: > Are you kidding? > > In all politeness, this is a completely unacceptable approach for most > users. You are implying that one would have to learn to write HTML syntax > (and if one would want to go beyond barebones presentation, CSS for styling > etc., and then probably also the occiasonal ARIA attribute here and there). > Can you envision any average Word user doing that? Most Word users are > already struggling when someone asks them to use styles (as opposed to > local formatting). > > Or am I missing something? > > Please come up with something more realistic. > > Olaf > > . > > On 16.06.2016, at 05:14, J. Albert Bowden <jalbertbowden@gmail.com> wrote: > > tools for working with HTML: any editor....literally any editor. you can > use notepad in windows even! and i mean notepad, not notepad++, simply save > the .txt document as .html instead. > > jedit has been my go to for nearly a decade now, sublime text is probably > one of the most popular on the market, atom is editor created by github, > brackets was created by adobe....just to name a few. > > tools for creating accessible HTML documents: w3c validators, tenion.io, > accessibility project's resouces: http://a11yproject.com/resources.html > and w3c's web accessibility evaluation tools > https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/, to name a few. > > pro tip: using HTML properly will get you closer to accessible than > anything else...not to take away from some of these tools, but properly > using HTML reinforces accessibility, because HTML has some accessibility > already baked in. > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Olaf Drümmer <olaflist@callassoftware.com > > wrote: > >> It seems there is some agreement that HTML is a good option, but Word is >> not the right tool to create HTML. >> >> Can anybody share which tools they use to make their accessible HTML >> files? >> >> Olaf >> > > > > -- > J. Albert Bowden II > > jalbertbowden@gmail.com > > http://bowdenweb.com/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2016 14:58:21 UTC