- From: Andrew Cunningham <andj.cunningham@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 01:51:24 +1000
- To: Duff Johnson <duff@duff-johnson.com>
- Cc: w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOUP6KkZ_a0WaQ=6ubjLUXqz8S0E9SBo5sAaeXSQ2YqyUtHRLA@mail.gmail.com>
It will be interesting to put it through its paces , esp with Hindi, Tamil or Myanmar documents or stress test it with Mende Kikakui documents and see if it will generate accessible PDF files. Andrew Cunningham andj.cunningham@gmail.com On 18 June 2016 at 00:48, Duff Johnson <duff@duff-johnson.com> wrote: > …and a related thought... > > Without implying any endorsement… there is an available plugin for Google > Docs that is intended to produce accessible (indeed, PDF/UA-conforming) PDF > documents from Google Docs. > > The product is in beta at this time. > > https://www.grackledocs.com/ > > Duff. > > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 20:45, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com> wrote: > > > > Just a thought…GoogleDocs now supports export to EPUB 3, which is HTML > packaged; it also has export to HTML. Perhaps a Word file with proper > styles and checked for accessibility (after Office 2010) could transform > that Word doc to something that would be cross platform and accessible? > > > > I am sure this is not the silver bullet, but worth exploring. > > > > > > Best > > George > > > > > > > > From: Andrew Cunningham [mailto:andj.cunningham@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 4:34 AM > > To: J. Albert Bowden > > Cc: Olaf Drümmer; w3c WAI List > > Subject: Re: Accessible Documents - PDF vs. HTML > > > > Yes ... for developers, and web support staff. But content owners and > content authors will not be using text editors ... they will either be > using ms > > > > So ... maybe the question is what building blocks exist to create an > editing environment yhat will generate accessible content assuming the > templates and themese used by a web application meet accessibility > requirements? > > > > A. > > > > On Thursday, 16 June 2016, J. Albert Bowden <jalbertbowden@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > tools for working with HTML: any editor....literally any editor. you > can use notepad in windows even! and i mean notepad, not notepad++, simply > save the .txt document as .html instead. > > > > > > jedit has been my go to for nearly a decade now, sublime text is > probably one of the most popular on the market, atom is editor created by > github, brackets was created by adobe....just to name a few. > > > > > > tools for creating accessible HTML documents: w3c validators, > tenion.io, accessibility project's resouces: > http://a11yproject.com/resources.html and w3c's web accessibility > evaluation tools https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/, to name a few. > > > > > > pro tip: using HTML properly will get you closer to accessible than > anything else...not to take away from some of these tools, but properly > using HTML reinforces accessibility, because HTML has some accessibility > already baked in. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Olaf Drümmer < > olaflist@callassoftware.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> It seems there is some agreement that HTML is a good option, but > Word is not the right tool to create HTML. > > >> > > >> Can anybody share which tools they use to make their accessible HTML > files? > > >> > > >> Olaf > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > J. Albert Bowden II > > > > > > jalbertbowden@gmail.com > > > > > > http://bowdenweb.com/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Cunningham > > andj.cunningham@gmail.com > > > > >
Received on Friday, 17 June 2016 15:51:52 UTC